|
by: Leonard Ferrari,
Chris Larsen, Dixon
Hanna, and Nick
Stone
In the report,
“Blueprint for a
High-Tech Cluster:
The Case of the
Microsystems Industry
in the Southwest,”
Ross DeVol, makes
the argument that
“research centers
and institutions
are undisputedly
the most important
factor in incubating
high-tech industries”.
DeVol asserts, “high-tech
clusters such as
Silicon Valley and
Austin owe much
of their prosperity
to research centers
and universities
where top scientists
can release their
creative energy.”
Other key ingredients
include a trained
and educated workforce,
technology spillovers
from nearby high-tech
industries, the
availability of
venture capital,
quality of living
factors (climate,
low crime rate,
good schools, affordable
housing) and cost
of doing business
factors.
To
date, the high tech
industry cluster
in Northern Virginia
(NVA) has grown
without the nurturing
influence of Virginia’s
largest research
universities. By
looking both nearby
to the North Carolina
Research Triangle
(NCRT) and west
to Silicon Valley
(SILVA) we begin
to see how involving
Virginia’s research
universities more
in Northern Virginia
could be the catalyst
for the next technology
boom.
Industry
Clusters & their
Importance
An industry cluster
is a geographic
concentration of
interdependent firms
in related industries,
and includes a significant
number of companies
that sell their
products and services
outside the region.
Healthy, outward-oriented
industry clusters
are a critical prerequisite
for a healthy economy.
Industry clusters
have emerged in
many regions of
the United States;
in IT, the three
clusters, SILVA,
NCRT, and NVA, have
all undergone enormous
growth over the
past decade, and
in spite of the
recent downturn
in the economy,
each is expected
to continue to evolve
as a dynamic high
technology corridor
in its respective
state.
The importance of
NVA to the State’s
economy cannot be
overestimated. Nearly
85 percent of Virginia’s
high technology
companies are located
within a 1,500 square
mile region bounded
by Washington DC
to the east, Leesburg
to the west, Maryland
to the north and
Fredericksburg to
the south. The region’s
technology industry
includes specializations
in systems integration,
information technology,
and technology services;
it accounts for
24 percent of all
professional employment
in Virginia. The
region employs more
than 250,000 technology
workers and has
a population of
1.3 million people.
TABLE
1. POPULATION
AND INDUSTRY
DATA |
| |
SILVA |
NCRT |
NVA |
| Total
Area (sq miles) |
1,500 |
1,500 |
1,500 |
| Total
Population (Millions) |
2.5 |
1.4 |
1.8 |
| Total
Jobs (Millions) |
1.35 |
0.9 |
1.3 |
| TechnologyJobs
(Thousands)
|
555 |
83 |
250 |
| and
Percent of Total
Jobs |
41% |
9% |
19% |
| Technology
Companies |
7,000 |
1,650 |
6,500 |
| Jobs/company |
79 |
50 |
38 |
Comparing
NVA to SILVA and
NCRT (Table 1) in
terms of size and
population, NVA
is similar SILVA,
however, the percentage
of technology jobs
in SILVA is more
than double that
of the NVA region.
NRTC is the least
densely populated
region of the three,
and the number of
technology companies
is also lowest,
but those companies
employ 30 percent
more employees than
their cousins in
NVA, and companies
in SILVA employ
over 100 percent
more.
While
the NVA cluster
developed largely
to provide technology
services to the
numerous federal
government agencies
and laboratories
based in the Capital
area, SILVA appears
to have emerged
more a result of
a set of favorable
conditions in Northern
California in the
early fifties and
sixties: a local
concentration of
universities including
two highly entrepreneurial
institutions (Stanford
and U.C. Berkeley),
a large financial
community in San
Francisco, a prime
location near three
large metropolitan
areas, a state government
willing to make
investments in education
and industry, and
the presence of
Hewlett-Packard,
not to mention an
outstanding climate
and the Californian
tradition of entrepreneurship.
If
the importance of
the universities
in stimulating SILVA’s
growth is difficult
to prove, with NCRT
it is quite clear.
The “Triangle” is
defined geographically
by the State’s three
largest research
universities at
each apex: the University
of North Carolina
in Chapel Hill,
Duke University
in Durham, and NC
State University
in Raleigh. The
research park in
its center represents
a concerted and
successful effort
to build a high
tech industry cluster
fueled by the research
capacity of the
three universities
|
TABLE
2. University
Influences
in SILVA,
NVA AND NRCT
|
| |
NSF
Ranking in Research |
Total
Research Expenditures
|
Number
of Students
|
Number
of Faculty |
Students/
Faculty |
| U.C.
Berkley |
7 |
$518,514 |
33,000 |
8,000 |
4.13 |
| Stanford |
8 |
$454,780 |
6,500 |
1,1650 |
3.94 |
| U.C.
San Francisco |
9 |
$443,013 |
2,457 |
16,256 |
0.15 |
| U.C.
Santa Cruz |
128 |
$56,212 |
13,000 |
2,000 |
6.50 |
| San
Jose State |
192 |
$21,005 |
25,952 |
1,622 |
16.00 |
|
San
Francisco
State |
286 |
$5,223 |
27,000 |
1,724 |
15.66 |
| Cal
State -Hayward |
N/A |
N/A |
13,000 |
1,200 |
10.83 |
| Ca/SILVA
Total |
|
$1,498,747 |
120,909 |
32,452 |
3.7 |
| Duke |
20 |
$356,625
|
12,176 |
2,000 |
6.09 |
| N.C.
State |
31 |
$277,946
|
28,619 |
1,600 |
17.89 |
| UNC
Chapel Hill
|
33 |
$269,072 |
24,892 |
1,550
|
16.06 |
| Wake
Forest |
107 |
$86,840 |
6,264
|
1,000 |
6.26 |
| NC/NCRT
Total |
|
$990,483 |
71,951 |
6,150 |
11.70 |
| George
Mason Univ.
|
173 |
$26,793 |
23,500 |
1,400 |
16.79 |
| Va/NVA
Total |
|
$26,793 |
23,500 |
1,400
|
16.79 |
NVA
is the outlier in
this aspect, because
none of the top
three research universities
in the Commonwealth
are headquartered
in northern Virginia.
Table 2 shows the
extent of research
investment by California,
North Carolina and
Virginia in these
three IT clusters.
It is easy to see
how powerful an
engine university
research has been
in SILVA and NCRT,
where appx. $1.5
billion and $1.0
billion are spent
annually on research.
NVA
has succeeded thus
far with only minimal
involvement of Virginia’s
major research universities.
So, it is tempting
to ask the question:
what would happen
in NVA if Virginia
research universities
were spending $0.5
to $1.0 billion
on research in the
area instead of
just $26 million?
Would the region
see an increase
in high tech manufacturing,
increased growth
and stability of
companies, an increase
in jobs and in highly
skilled labor? It
is difficult to
see a down side
to putting this
to the test.
The
seeds of a university
cluster in northern
Virginia have already
been planted. George
Washington University
has a facility in
Loudon County. Virginia
Tech and UVA share
a facility in Falls
Church and George
Mason University
has facilities in
Prince William,
Fairfax and Arlington
Counties. Virginia
Tech has also started
a research facility
in Alexandria, VA.
At the current time
these facilities
are used primarily
to house teaching
programs and the
total research expenditures
in the NVA region
are on the order
of $30 million per
year. With a simple
shift of priorities
and a willingness
to join forces to
attract new technology
research in heavily
funded areas like
homeland security
and the life sciences,
the region could
soon develop a large
technology product
manufacturing cluster,
bolstering and benefiting
from the existing
technology services
sector.
To
achieve this, the
universities and
other research institutions
will need to increase
their overall research
expenditures in
the region 30 to
50-fold. This does
not mean that every
Virginia university
needs a comprehensive
campus in the NVA
region, but it does
imply that the region
could easily support
and benefit from
significant growth
in full-time and
part-time graduate
degree programs
and associated increase
in endemic research
facilities. Promoting
the expansion of
Virginia’s research
institutions in
northern Virginia
and encouraging
their sustained
growth and collaboration
may be the ultimate
“smart” investment
for the common good
and the Commonwealth.
top
of page
|
|